Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Collapse vs. Non Collapse: What if...

4 comments:

Unknown said...

So, if you hadn't of collapsed, you would have been running so fast you'd have aged 15 years in the last mile and been 19th in the M45-49 category ?

All things considered, it is probably better that you stayed 34. No race is worth that sort of price.

MW said...

you're entirely correct.
i found someone in my age group and fixed it.
thanks for pointing out my stupidity.

Unknown said...

My comment was funnier before you spoiled it. Thanks for nothing.

Buzz said...

I still say you have a better story with the collapse, who wants to go out and run their first marathon perfectly? What would motivate you for the next one? Or the next one?